Meral, Thank you for your review (once again!) Was there ever a response to the comments?
Having reviewed the comments, I agree with the examples comment, but I don't think there's anything in the comments that would cause me to raise a Discuss. Editorial issues are largely up to the editors, and hopefully this feedback will be considered by them. But in general I do like to hear from someone that the comments have been considered. Jari On Dec 3, 2013, at 7:03 AM, Meral Shirazipour <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq . > > Please resolve any Last Call comments you may receive. > > > Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-25 > Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour > Review Date: 2013-11-18/2013-12-02 > IETF LC End Date: End of November (special deadline) > IESG Telechat date: 2013-12-19 > > > > Summary: > This draft is almost ready to be published as Proposed Standard but I have > some comments. > > > Major issues: > none > > > Minor issues: > none > > > Nits/editorial comments: > Part 4 of: > draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging (82 pages) > draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics (98 pages) > *draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional (27 pages) > draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range (24 pages) > draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache (41 pages) > draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth (18 pages) > draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations (7 pages) > draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations (5 pages) > > -[Page 4], Introduction, it would make the draft clearer if we give 1-2 every > day examples of when conditions are used/useful. > > -[Page 10], "filesystem"---->"file system" > > -General comment: since mostly used with caching, why not considered merging > with part 6? > > - [Page 22], Security section, as mentioned in my other reviews, would it be > better to have a separate draft to discuss all security issues related to > HTTP? > > Best Regards, > Meral > > --- > Meral Shirazipour > Ericsson Research > www.ericsson.com > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
