Hi Russ, Personally I can see that your suggested change to the text would result in more clarity.
I would be happy to make this change. Regards Andy > -----Original Message----- > From: Russ Housley [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 03 January 2014 17:00 > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-architecture-11 > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-siprec-architecture-11 > Reviewer: Russ Housley > Review Date: 2014-01-03 > IETF LC End Date: 2013-10-01 > IESG Telechat date: 2014-01-09 > > Summary: > > Thank you for addressing the issues raised in my previous review. > This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. > > Major Concerns: None. > > Minor Concerns: None. > > Editorial Comments: > > The changes to Section 3.2.4 to resolve my earlier comment have > introduced a clarity problem. I suggest a minor rewording to fix it. > > 3.2.4. Media Stream Mixing > > In a basic session involving only audio there are typically two > audio/RTP streams between the two UAs involved transporting media in > each direction. When recording this media, the two streams may be > mixed or not mixed at the SRC before being transmitted to the SRS. > In the case when they are not mixed, two separate streams are sent > to the SRS. In the mixed case, a single mixed media stream is sent > to the SRS. However, in the case when the media streams are not > mixed, the SDP offer sent to the SRS must describe two separate > media streams. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
