Thanks for your review and re-review, Vijay. And thanks for the authors for the changes that occurred between the two reviews.
I do agree with Vijay's point about R13 and R14. Jari On Jan 21, 2014, at 6:32 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-req-06 > Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani > Review Date: Jan-21-2014 > IETF LC End Date: Unknown > IESG Telechat date: Jan-23-2014 > > Major: 0 > Minor: 0 > Nits: 2 > > This document is ready for publication as an Informational. > > The document is ready, most of the nits in the nit-list I had have > been addressed by the IESG during balloting. That said, the remaining > nits on my list are: > > - The requirements in the Security Considerations section (R13 and R14) > are better put in Section 6 (Ease of Provisioning Requirements), no? > Is there something intrinsic to do with security on R13 and R14 that > they are put in the Security Considerations section? If there is, it > is not apparent to me. > > - Grammar/language: Section 7, Requirement 9: > s/This gives rise to two/This results in two/ > (Reason: "gives rise to" is probably best left to works of > fiction :-) ) > > Thanks, > > - vijay > -- > Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent > 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA) > Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected] > Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
