Joel,
Thanks for your review of the document. We have made the changes you
suggested in your review in the -12 version.
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-12.txt
Let us know if there are any other issues.
- Alan -
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]>wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-10
> A Mechanism for Transporting User to User
> Call Control Information in SIP
> Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
> Review Date: 19-May-2013
> IETF LC End Date: 29-May-2013
> IESG Telechat date: N/A
>
> Summary: This document is nearly ready for publication as a Proposed
> Standard
>
> Major issues:
>
> Minor issues:
> The requirements discussions for redirection and referral (second
> paragraph of section 3, in regards REQ-3) includes what appears to be
> normative requirements on redirecting devices.
> a) This would seem to belong in section 4 on Normative Definition.
> b) It would seem that there ought to be some discussion of what happens
> with redirecting devices that do not understand this new UUI. (I presume
> things work, but I don't see how.)
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
> In section 8.2, given that this is a WG document, should the "the
> authors believe" actually be "the WG believes"? Or even, given IETF rough
> consensus on this document, "the IETF believes"?
> _______________________________________________
> cuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cuss
>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
