On Friday, January 31, 2014, Sam Hartman wrote: > Thanks Scott. > In the interest of being clear about my position, I support publication > of 04 but do not support publication of 05.
I don't know why you object 05. > > I think all the discussion that is useful has happened and all that > remains is the consensus call from the sponsoring AD. > The AD should read all comments from the community of practical statements and AD to follow/sponsor reasonable statements/discussions or policies, not sponsoring best future plan as best current practice ( it may be initial plan for BCP). IMHO, the AD powers are not to be used against reasonable engineering discussions/requests only if that AD has done sound reasonable engineering replies. AB
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
