Hi Scott, Thanks for your review!
It was our understanding that obsoleted and historic rfcs can still be referenced... During the discussion in the WG, much of the discussion, and historic conjecture was decided to have to go, to be replaced with "lessons learned". But for someone not familiar, the old text describing some of the thoughts that went into the design of the options, might still be useful to know.. It's unclear to me how to address your comment. Do you propose to remove the 2nd sentence? Or is the question you actually ask in your comment something to be answered by IESG, and either requires no change, or potentially the removal of all 1323 references throughout the document... Richard Scheffenegger > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Brim [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Montag, 10. Februar 2014 19:18 > To: gen-art; [email protected] > Subject: Fwd: gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-19 > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Scott Brim <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:49 AM > Subject: gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-19 > To: gen-art <[email protected]> > > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen- > ART, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you > may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-19 > Reviewer: Scott Brim > Review Date: 2014-02-10 > IETF LC End Date: 2014-02-18 > IESG Telechat date: not yet > > Summary: Ready with a minor issue > > Major issues: none > > Minor issues: > > > For brevity, the full discussions of the merits and history behind the > > TCP options defined within this document have been omitted. > > [RFC1323] should be consulted for reference. > > The reader is referred to RFC 1323 for background information > (basically an informative reference) ... but if this draft obsoletes > RFC 1323, can it refer the reader to it? > > Nits/editorial comments: none > > > Thanks ... Scott _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
