I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-pwe3-iccp-13.txt Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review Date: 2/19/14 IETF LC End Date: 2/11/14 IESG Telechat date: 2/20/14 Summary: Ready with issues. I did not see any answer from the editors or shepherd to the issues raised in the IETFLC Gen-ART review and there was no revision of the document since then. Although none of the issues raised seems to be blocking, I believed that they should be considered and answered as part of the IETF Last Call Comments. This is a complex but well written document. It is ready, a number of minor issues need clarification and possibly editing. Some nits also may be considered to fix Major issues: None Minor issues: 1. The document (and the name of the protocol defined here) uses the notion of 'chassis'. However there is no definition or reference to a definition that would clarify what a 'chassis' is. 2. In section 7.2.2.1 - I am not a fan of transferring information in text format like in the Disconnect Cause String - no interoperability results if there no agreement on a finite set of causes. Anyway - should this not be UTF-8 format? 3. Similar question in Section 7.2.4 - why is Aggregator Name a text? Why not using AggregatorID as per IEEE 802.1AX? 4. In Section 7.2.5 - if Port Speed corresponds to the ifHighSpeed object in the IF-MIB, should not also Port (interface) name correspond to ifName truncated to 20 characters whenever possible? Nits/editorial comments: 1. Some acronyms need expansion at the first occurrence - e.g. POP, CO 2. In section 3.3/i: PE nodes MAY be collocated or remote - this MAY needs not be capitalized. 3. The first two lines in the diagram in page 16 are mis-aligned 4. The diagrams in 7.1.1., 7.1.5 end at 16-bit boundary with the last field defined for optional sub-TLVs. Is this intentional? Do they suggest that the number of octets is always 4*n + 2? What happens else? 5. In section 7.3.1:' -ii. PW ID TLV or generalized PW ID TLV' I think what is meant is actually ' -ii. One of PW ID TLV or generalized PW ID TLV'
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
