Thanks for your review, Brian. Jari
On Feb 4, 2014, at 1:31 AM, Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-tlv-extension-01.txt > Reviewer: Brian Carpenter > Review Date: 2014-02-04 > IETF LC End Date: 2014-02-07 > IESG Telechat date: > > Summary: Ready > -------- > > Comments: > --------- > > This draft is well-written and clear. > > It retro-fits extensibility to two existing specifications. > As an author of RFC 6709 I find this an interesting exercise. Do > the hints in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6709#section-4 help, > especially bullet 2? > > Minor Issues: > ------------ > > It is highly unusual for a draft to formally update another draft > (draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2), even though the latter is approved and > in the RFC queue. If we were a rational organisation, that draft > would be updated before publication. > > (The writeup actually says "The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol > version 2 (OLSRv2) has been published as Standards Track." but that is > inaccurate.) > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
