Thanks for your review, Tom! I will place a Yes vote on the document once the ballot comes available. (Stephen?)
Jari On May 9, 2014, at 3:37 AM, Tom Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01 > Reviewer: Tom Taylor > Review Date: 2014/05/08 > IETF LC End Date: 2014/05/29 > IESG Telechat date: (if known) > > Summary: This document is ready to move forward, taking for granted that the > Ed25519 algorithm is fit for purpose. My knowledge of security is not > sufficient to make that determination. > > Major issues: None. > > Minor issues: None. > > Nits/editorial comments: The very tiniest of nits: two periods rather than > one following the Section 2 header number. > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
