I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
Document: draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-10 Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date: 30 June 2014 IETF LC End Date: 1 July 2014 IETF Telechat Date: 10 July 2014 Summary: The document is well written, and almost ready for publication. However, there is a minor issue which I ask the authors to address. Major Issues: None Minor Issues: Section 3.12 talks about keep alive signaling. Q1: The sending of keep alives is a SHOULD, and there are no procedures on how to act if keep alives are not received. There isn't even a mechanism to negotiate the sending of keep alives. So, I assume it means that a peer shall not take any actions if it does NOT receive keep alives, or even rely on receiving keep alives to begin with? If so, I think it would be good to clarify that. Q2: As the sending of keep alives is a SHOULD, are there example cases when keep alives would NOT be sent? Q3: The text saying "to each peer it wants to interact with in the future" sounds a little strange to me. How does a peer know with whom it wants to interact in the future? Perhaps the text instead should talk about peers with whom one wants to maintain a signaling channel, or something like that? Editorial nits: None Regards, Christer _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
