Elwyn,
thanks for the review. I'll get to most things later, but let me comment on:
> s1, para 2:
OLD
It obsoletes the original version ("v1") [RFC2629], which contained
the original language definition, and which was subsequently extended
("v2", [V1rev]). Furthermore, it discusses potential extensions in a
future revision ("v3").
NEW:
It obsoletes the initial version ("v1") [RFC2629], which contained
the original language definition, and which was subsequently extended
("v1rev", [V1rev]), which has been the vocabulary understood by
version 1 of the xml2rfc processor (written in TCL). The v2 vocabulary
is a superset of the v1 vocabulary with relatively minor improvements
and is understood by version 2 of the xml2rfc processor (written in
Python) which superseded the version 1 processor in 2014.
right away :-)
That proposed change is factually incorrect. The Python code understands
exactly the same vocabulary as the TCL code (ignoring bugs for a moment).
Best regards, Julian
--
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art