Elwyn,

thanks for the review. I'll get to most things later, but let me comment on:

> s1, para 2:
OLD
    It obsoletes the original version ("v1") [RFC2629], which contained
    the original language definition, and which was subsequently extended
    ("v2", [V1rev]).  Furthermore, it discusses potential extensions in a
    future revision ("v3").
NEW:
    It obsoletes the initial version ("v1") [RFC2629], which contained
    the original language definition, and which was subsequently extended
    ("v1rev", [V1rev]), which has been the vocabulary understood by
    version 1 of the xml2rfc processor (written in TCL).  The v2 vocabulary
    is a superset of the v1 vocabulary with relatively minor improvements
    and is understood by version 2 of the xml2rfc processor (written in
    Python) which superseded the version 1 processor in 2014.

right away :-)

That proposed change is factually incorrect. The Python code understands exactly the same vocabulary as the TCL code (ignoring bugs for a moment).

Best regards, Julian

--

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to