Thanks for the review, Scott. Keith, Alan - have you observed the suggestion for an editorial change below?
Jari On 03 Aug 2014, at 13:28, Scott Brim <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at < > http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a > new version of the draft. > Document: draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-isdn-09 > Reviewer: Scott Brim > Review Date: 2014-08-02 > IETF LC End Date: 2014-05-14 > IESG Telechat date: 2014-08-07 > > Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC, with > one nit. > > Nits/editorial comments: > > A new sentence needs reworking: > > "If an interworking point is reached, and the limitations of the ISDN (see > section 3.1) are not met, then the UUI data will not be transferred, although > the SIP request will otherwise be interworked, rather than have the > interworking point attempt to resolve the non- compliance with the > limitations of ISDN." > > I suggest splitting it into two sentences, something like: > > "If an interworking point is reached, and the limitations of the ISDN (see > section 3.1) are not met, then the UUI data will not be transferred, although > the SIP request will otherwise be interworked. This is rather than have the > interworking point attempt to resolve the non- compliance with the > limitations of ISDN." > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
