Ted Lemon 写道:
On Oct 6, 2014, at 8:09 PM, Xing Li <[email protected]> wrote:
This is the decision of the WG and moves forward in Softwire Interim Meeting in
Beijing, Sept, 2011.
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/current/msg02631.html We may add
some historical background in the next version.
I don't think this is necessary. I believe this document is in charter
because it is just using NAT64 in a new way, not defining a new translation
mechanism. The message you quoted doesn't really address the issue; I suspect
this was discussed with Ralph back then, but I think we are okay. However,
it's possible that the IESG will want to explore the issue further; worst case,
we recharter. I don't think this needs to be addressed in the document.
I agree, thanks! xing
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
