> > Agree to unify the terminology. We may add a “Terminology section” similar to > the ones in [I-D.ietf-softwire-map] (Section 3).
would something like: This document describes a set of common DHCPv6 options for configuring the MAP-E [I-D.ietf-softwire-map], MAP-T [I-D.ietf-softwire-map-t] and Lightweight 4over6 [I-D.ietf-softwire-lw4over6] mechanisms. For definition of the terminology used in this document please see the relevant terminology sections in the above references. work? in the S46 Overview section. cheers, Ole > > Regards > > Congxiao > > >> Minor issues: >> ------------- >> >> To avoid a long discussion with the RFC Editor about the number of authors, >> please consider having one author tagged as Editor and the rest as a list of >> Contributors, as described in RFC 7322. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gen-art mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
