Thanks for the review. Kathleen, can you speak to Joel’s questions below? Thanks.
Jari On 18 Sep 2014, at 14:47, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer-10 > JSON Web Token (JWT) Profile for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and > Authorization Grants > Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern > Review Date: 18-Sept-2014 > IETF LC End Date: 29-Sept-2014 > IESG Telechat date: N/A > > Summary: This document appears to be ready for publicaiton as a Proposed > Standard. > > This reviewer would suggest that the General AD check with parties who can > confirm the two notes below. > > Note that the reviewer did not review RFC 6749, draft-ietf-oauth-assertions, > or draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token, but simply takes as given that the work > here is consistent with that work. > > Similarly, the reviewer assumes that the subtleties of internationalization > of issuers (and any other fields that must be compared). It is not obvious > whether pointing to the RFC 3986 is sufficient, but it is not obviously > insufficient. > > Major issues: N/A > > Minor issues: > I presume it is clear from the underlying documents whether the periods at > the ends of intermediate lines in the examples are supposed to be there. > > Nits/editorial comments: N/A > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
