Great. Thank you. Jari
On 30 Oct 2014, at 16:23, Robert Sparks <[email protected]> wrote: > No, they aren't typically at the moment, but they should be added soon > (during next week if things go right). > > For those on genart that haven't found it already, you can check what the > alias expands to at the moment > for any given draft by looking at > <http://tools.ietf.org/draft/aliases> > (and a similar page gives you the -chair and -ad aliases for groups: > <http://tools.ietf.org/ad/aliases>) > > All of this is in the process of being moved to @ietf.org instead of > @tools.ietf.org, and adding the shepherd to .all is > caught up in that move. > > RjS > > On 10/30/14 8:55 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: >> Robert, can you confirm that we do not currently have shepherds on .all? I’m >> getting some conflicting data about this, and I’m too busy today to figure >> out a test case to actually try this out. >> >> Jari >> >> On 30 Oct 2014, at 15:48, Scott Brim <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Jari Arkko <[email protected]> wrote: >>> We recently had a case where a document shepherd did not receive a review, >>> because he didn’t happen to be one of the WG chairs. >>> >>> Gen-ART reviewers tend to send their reviews to draft-foo.all address. >>> Shepherd names are available in the tracker, but we do not normally dig >>> them up.. because normally they are part of .all. >>> >>> Thoughts on what we should do about this? >>> >>> Add shepherds to .all >>> >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
