Thanks, all!

Jari

On 01 Dec 2014, at 17:29, Robert Sparks <[email protected]> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
> or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-13
> Reviewer: Robert Sparks
> Review Date: 1 Dec 2014
> IETF LC End Date: past
> IESG Telechat date: 4 Dec 2014
> 
> Summary: Ready for publication as an Informational RFC
> 
> This revision addresses my question below.
> 
> RjS
> 
> On 8/5/14 2:58 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>> 
>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>> 
>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
>> you may receive.
>> 
>> Document: draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-12
>> Reviewer: Robert Sparks
>> Review Date: 5-Aug-2014
>> IETF LC End Date: 8-Aug-2014
>> IESG Telechat date: Not on an upcoming telechat agenda
>> 
>> Summary: Ready for publication as Informational
>> 
>> This document handles a complex description problem in a very accessible way.
>> Thank you for the effort that has gone into creating it.
>> 
>> One minor point to double-check:
>> 
>> This document goes out of its way to push decisions about measuring in 
>> packets,
>> bytes, or other units to the concrete  encoding proposals. RFC6789 was 
>> explicit
>> about conex exposing a metric of congestion-volume measured in bytes.
>> 
>> RFC6789 was published a couple of years ago - has that part of it become 
>> stale?
>> If so, it would be good for this document to explicitly call that out.
>> 
>> If not, (most of section 4.6 goes back to -04 which predates RFC6789),
>> does this document need to retain the this flexibility in its description?
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to