On 31 Dec 2014, at 15:08, Francis Dupont <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps-07.txt > Reviewer: Francis Dupont > Review Date: 20141224 > IETF LC End Date: 20141224 > IESG Telechat date: unknown > > Summary: Ready > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > 5 page 4: in "its lower layer should provide this" > the term "should" is ambiguous, i.e., either it is a keyword > and SHOULD is better, or it is not and a different word should be used. > Note I don't know the authors' intention so the best solution. Hi Francis, thanks for the review. I changed "should" to "have to". Best regards Michael > > Regards > > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
