Thanks for your review, Brian. On 16 Jan 2015, at 04:23, Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
> (sorry, repeat with corrected Subject header) > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd > or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > Document: draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt > Reviewer: Brian Carpenter > Review Date: 2014-10-24 > IETF LC End Date: 2014-11-18 > IESG Telechat date: 2015-01-22 > > Summary: Almost ready > -------- > > Comment: > -------- > > I am one of those who thinks this should not be on the standards track, > but rather should just be documented to describe current practice. But > that is not a Gen-ART comment. > > Minor issues: > ------------- > > As the writeup says: "The IANA Considerations section is a bit sparse. > It should at least name the registry it's updating for convenience of the > reader." > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
