I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05
Reviewer: Tom Taylor
Review Date: 2015/02/02
IETF LC End Date:2015/02/13
IESG Telechat date: (if known)
Summary: This document is ready to go with minor editorial issues.
Major issues:
Minor issues:
Nits/editorial comments:
The Ombudsteam is taken for granted from Section 2 onwards. It would be
nice to mention in the Introduction that the IESG mentioned
Ombudspersons in its statement of anti-harassment policy [1], but did
not define the procedures under which the Ombudsteam would be
constituted and under which they would operate. This document remedies
that lack.
Reference URIs [1] and [2] are identical. Should one be removed?
Presumably the Ombudsteam web site will be set up upon approval of this
document -- it does not exist at the moment.
Section 4.1, first paragraph, fourth line: s/objection/objections/
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
