This could be removed. I just discussed with Guang and we remember that it was about a comment in SAVI meetings year ago about network bond ( a scenario that multiple NIC cards with the same IP address).
Jun -----Original Message----- From: Fred Baker (fred) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 1:50 PM To: Jun Bi; 姚广（博士） Cc: Elwyn Davies; Alissa Cooper; General area reviewing team; [email protected] Subject: Re: Gen-art telechat review of draft-ietf-savi-dhcp-32 > s11.3: I am unclear how the processes described could lead to multiple > binding anchors being established on the same SAVI device. Could you quote > an example please? I am unsure how a client with multiple attachments could > be using the same address on each of them. This is one point I’m unclear on in all this. In the draft I sent earlier, this is actually 11.4. Could you clarify the case here? _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
