On 23 Dec, 2014, at 19:03, Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why not update the document to say so explicitly, and fix the idnits while
> you're at it?
I have added some text to clarify this.
REQ2: For use cases C, D, and E, there should be a way to configure
Scopes of Discovery that support a range of topologically-
independent zones (e.g., from department to campus-wide).
This capability must exist in the protocol; individual
operators are not required to use this capability in all
cases -- in particular, use case C should support Zero
Configuration operation where that is desired.
We should let the RFC Editor update the references at publication time --
there’s little benefit in chasing a moving target.
Stuart Cheshire
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
