(Belated) thanks for the review, Martin. As this document is proceeding given the RSSAC progress, we are now looking at it again, and as a part of that I’m going through all last call comments and Gen-ART reviews.
But back to your review. As you may have seen, I think -02 addresses this issue. (By deleting the text, which I think also works.) Jari On 23 May 2014, at 20:37, Martin Thomson <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd > or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > Document: draft-iab-2870bis-01 > Reviewer: Martin Thomson > Review Date: > IETF LC End Date: 2014-06-20 > IESG Telechat date: (if known) > > Summary: Looks good. > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: > > This seems like a prohibition by omission: > MAY also serve the root-servers.net zone, and the zone for the > .arpa top-level domain [ARPAZONE],[RFC3172]. > That is, it could be read to imply that root servers are prohibited > from serving other zones. Why was this position taken rather than > simply noting that the root servers might serve other zones without > stipulating specifics?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
