Thanks Jaime and Roni.

Jari

On 05 May 2015, at 12:32, Jaime Jiménez <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> thanks for the comments, replies are inline. I will add those changes to the 
> draft once the last call process is over.
> 
> Ciao,
> - - Jaime Jimenez
> 
>> On 27 Apr 2015, at 19:07, Roni Even <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on 
>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>> 
>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you 
>> may receive.
>> 
>> Document:  draft-jimenez-p2psip-coap-reload-08
>> Reviewer: Roni Even
>> Review Date:2015–4-27
>> IETF LC End Date: 2015–5-13
>> IESG Telechat date: 
>>  
>> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Standard Track  RFC.
>>  
>>  
>> Major issues:
>> Minor issues:
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>> 
>> Some questions about the terminology in section 3
>> 
>>      • Client – is this different from RFC6940, if not why repeat?
> -- You are correct, it is the same, we can just add a reference to RFC6940
> 
>>      •
>>      • Router – this is a different name for a peer? I also noticed that it 
>> is used once in the document (defining constrained node) where it does not 
>> provide any value
> -- Also agree, we could simply leave it in peer.
>>      •
>>      • Proxy and Proxy node – Why do you need both terms. In section 7 it 
>> uses proxy(PN) like it is the same term.
> -- This was done to differenciate between physical node and the role they 
> play functionally. For the spec itself only the functional roles are 
> important, the others just give a better picture of the types of nodes you 
> can have. We could just call both Proxy Node if it helps. 
>>      •
>>      • Constrained node the last sentence “In the latter case the node is 
>> often connected to a  continuous energy power supply” it is not clear what 
>> is the latter case, also what type of node is meant. Note that there is a 
>> redundant “either a” in the previous sentence.
> -- Correct it should be:
> "A CN is always either a Sensor or an Actuator.  If it is an actuator, the 
> node is often connected to a continuous energy power supply."
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to