Hi Meral, Thanks for your feedback. See inline
-----Original Message----- From: Meral Shirazipour <[email protected]> Date: Saturday, 16 May 2015 1:47 am To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-13 Resent-From: <[email protected]> Resent-To: <[email protected]> Resent-Date: Saturday, 16 May 2015 1:48 am >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. > >Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you >may receive. > >Document: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-13 >Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour >Review Date: 2015-05-15 >IETF LC End Date: 2015-05-15 >IESG Telechat date: NA > > >Summary: >This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have >some comments . > > > >Major issues: > >Minor issues: > >Nits/editorial comments: > >-The abstract lacks context, please consider adding some more text. A >suggestion: repeat the first sentence from the intro in the abstract: >"To prevent attacks on peers, endpoints have to ensure the remote peer is >willing to receive traffic." Sure we will add this text > >-[Page 2] Intro: It was not clear if this document is specific to webRTC >implementations. Is there any limitation to only use for webRTC? Maybe a >sentence in the intro could clarify if there is or there is not such >Limitation This document does not restrict itself to webRTC implementations alone which is the reason we have not specified any where that Consent freshness is for only webRTC clients. Any full ICE implementations can use Consent freshness. We have this text at the end of introduction in the current draft "This document defines what it takes to obtain, maintain, and lose consent to send. Consent to send applies to a single 5-tuple. How applications react to changes in consent is not described in this document. Consent is obtained only by full ICE implementations. An ICE-lite implementation will not generate consent checks, but will just respond to consent checks it receives." Is this not sufficient ? Regards, Ram _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
