Hi Meral, we will be addressing these comments as per the reply I had sent to your email . I am currently holding off the edits as we had couple of comments from the WG which Martin is addressing. Once that is taken care, I will address your comments. My responses to your comments are here - http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg14627.html
Regards, Ram From: Meral Shirazipour <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tuesday, 26 May 2015 10:42 am To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-13 Resent-From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Resent-To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Resent-Date: Tuesday, 26 May 2015 10:43 am I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-13 Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour Review Date: 2015-05-25 IETF LC End Date: 2015-05-15 IESG Telechat date: 2015-05-28 Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I had some comments . Nits/editorial comments: Please see LC review threads: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg11686.html Best Regards, Meral --- Meral Shirazipour Ericsson Research www.ericsson.com
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
