Thanks for the review & edits, Robert, Alexey, and Peter. Jari
On 22 Apr 2015, at 16:03, Robert Sparks <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 4/22/15 5:50 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: >> Hi Robert, >> >> On 21/04/2015 21:21, Robert Sparks wrote: >>> Nit: >>> >>> The introduction calls out email addresses as an example of the kinds of >>> strings these methods are not intended for use in preparing (along with >>> LDAP distinguished names). But in the body of the document, email addresses >>> (or strings that look just like them) are discussed as valid examples of >>> usernames. >> Email address like things are commonly used as usernames, but strictly >> speaking they are 2 different types of objects. How do you think we can make >> this clearer? > I don't think drawing the distinction helps the document. Peter's suggestion > wfm. >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
