Thanks for your review, David. Jari
On 21 Apr 2015, at 02:54, Black, David <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix-01 > Reviewer: David Black > Review Date: April 20, 2015 > IETF LC End Date: April 20, 2015 > > Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that > should be fixed before publication. > > This is a short crisp draft on behavior of CIDR prefixes in IPv6 forwarding > with respect to the /64 boundary in IPv6 addresses. It's clear, well > explained > easy to understand, plus refreshingly short. Nicely done! > > Major issues: (none) > > Minor issues: (none) > > Nits/editorial comments: Ok, I found a nit ... and so did idnits ;-). > > -- Abstract > > Hardware and software > algorithms should therefore impose no rules on prefix length, but > implement longest-match-first on prefixes of any valid length. > > "algorithms" isn't the right word. > I suggest "implementations of routing and forwarding" > > idnits pointed out that: A later version (-06) exists of > draft-ietf-opsec-v6-05 > > Thanks, > --David > ---------------------------------------------------- > David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer > EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 > +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 > [email protected] Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 > ---------------------------------------------------- > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
