Thanks, all. I have placed a No-Objection position on this document for today’s IESG telechat.
Jari On 15 May 2015, at 21:44, Vijay K. Gurbani <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/15/2015 12:42 PM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: >> This is Mobile-IP-specific terminology, and has a well-known and precise >> meaning within this area. It is necessary to specify if an extension is >> skippable or non-skippable -- it determines both the numeric range from >> which the extension number must be allocated, and how the extension must >> be processed. > > Henrik: Ah, I see. I was not aware of this usage, but since it is an > established practice in the community then we are golden. Thanks for > clarifying. > > [...] > >>> > Suggested text: >>> > >>> > When a mobile node registers multiple bindings with its home >>> > agent, each using a different care-of address, then each of those >>> > bindings are given a unique identifier. >> Looks good to me. > > Perfect. Thanks for attending my comments. I don't have any more. > > Have a nice weekend. > > Cheers, > > - vijay > -- > Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent > 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA) > Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected] > Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
