Thanks for your review, Suresh. FWIW, I agree with your comment. Jari
On 25 Jun 2015, at 01:28, Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it would be great if the document had a section indicating > what has changed since RFC5117. Even listing just the new topologies > would be very useful (e.g. Something that mentions that Sections 3.2, > 3.4, 3.7 and 3.10 are new topologies). That way somebody who is already > familiar with RFC5117 can look at the new stuff right away.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
