Thanks Elwyn, I've noted those nits as an RFC editor note for now so they don't get lost.
Cheers, S. On 03/07/15 15:01, Elwyn Davies wrote: > Hi, Viktor. > > I had a quick look through the new version 13 and it has addressed > almost all the various nits I identified and looked at the issues I > mentioned. > > I am not totally convinced about the remaining usage of RFC 2118 > keywords, but I'll leave that for the ADs to consider. Barry Leiba (if > I remember correctly) is particularly exercised about this area - might > be worth having a word with him. > > There are a couple of nits introduced by the edits (or left over from > the previous version): > > s3, para 2: s/ When a servers does/When a server does/, > s/SHOULD respond/the server SHOULD respond/ > > s10.1, next to last para: s/as when significantly/as the full > certificates are significantly/ > > s12, bullet 4: s/to processes extended/to process extended/ > > s14, last para: s/PKIX-TA(0(/PKIX-TA(0)/ > > Regards, > Elwyn _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
