Hi Acee,
I checked out the changes in the new version (12) and they look good.
Thanks a lot for taking care of the changes. Only one pending comment
from me. I will send in a new review.
On 08/19/2015 06:53 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>> * IANA Considerations
>>
>> * The Opaque LSA Options types used by this document (7 & 8) seem to be
>> wrongly entered into the IANA registry and are pointing to
>> [draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions] instead of this draft. It
>> is probably worth taking this up during the IANA check.
>
> No - these values do correspond to segment routing. This draft is a
> prerequisite that defines the OSPF extension mechanisms and creates the
> registry.
I leave this to your discretion, but the IANA registry usually points to
the draft that defined the values and
draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions *does not* seem to be
defining them.
Just to be very precise these are the values that I am talking about
"
This specification updates the Opaque Link-State Advertisements (LSA)
Option Types with the following values:
o 7 (IANA Early Allocation [RFC7120]) - OSPFv2 Extended Prefix
Opaque LSA
o 8 (IANA Early Allocation [RFC7120]) - OSPFv2 Extended Link Opaque
LSA
"
and this is the IANA registry in question
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-opaque-types/ospf-opaque-types.xhtml#ospf-opaque-types-2
Cheers
Suresh
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
