Donald:

>>> Document: draft-ietf-trill-pseudonode-nickname-05
>>> Reviewer: Russ Housley
>>> Review Date: 2015-08-24
>>> IETF LC End Date: 2015-09-01
>>> IESG Telechat date: unknown
>>> 
>>> Summary: Almost Ready
>>> 
>>> Major Concerns:
>>> 
>>> ...
>> ...
>> 
>>> (2)  Also, in Section 5.2, Step 1, I think the intended sort order depends 
>>> on all
>>> of the LAALP IDi values being represented with the same number of bits.
>>> Since Section 9.1 provides a variable length field to carry a LAALP ID 
>>> value, I
>>> assume that they are not always the same length.  Is a step needed to
>>> encode the LAALP ID to a consistent length?
>> 
>> [MZ] The sort is done in the per-LAALP base. It's not necessary to make the 
>> LAALP ID to a constant length. Besides, the 'mod' function always returns a 
>> value in [0, k-1] whatever the length of LAALP ID is.
> 
> We could add "considering System ID and LAALP ID as byte strings".

I am not sure that is enough unless all of the System IDs are the same length.

Russ

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to