Brian, Jari, all, Some information on whether it should be update or extension:
For the particular use case - supporting MVPN C-Bidir (Customer Bidirectional PIM) with Ingress Replication - the optimized procedures in this new specification should be used on all PEs for the involved VPN. The old procedures can still be used (but not mixed) even for this use case but they involve much more signaling. I am not sure if this constitutes "update" or just an extension and I appreciate your input. Thanks. Jeffrey > -----Original Message----- > From: Jari Arkko [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 7:40 PM > To: Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]>; draft-ietf-bess-mvpn- > [email protected] > Cc: General Area Review Team <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn- > bidir-ingress-replication-03 > > Thanks for your review(s), Brian! Much appreciated. Re: the update > question. Good question. What say the rest of you? > > Jari _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
