Himanshu, This looks good to me. Can you please submit the updated draft?
Regards, Alia On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Shah, Himanshu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ralph and Alia - > > Ralph - I have replace the sequence number/mac withdraw sub-TLV > registration, > Section with request for the value 0x0001 from the LDP's TLV type name > space. > Please review and verify that it addresses your concern. > > Alia - I have also addressed your concern by replacing the original text > with > Steve Bryant's offered text (which you stated you were OK with). Please > review, > verify and accept by removing "DISCUSS" on this draft review. > > Thanks, > Himanshu > > -----Original Message----- > From: Shah, Himanshu > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 7:05 PM > To: 'Ralph Droms (rdroms)' > Cc: Andrew G. Malis; A. Jean Mahoney; General Area Review Team; > [email protected]; The IESG > Subject: RE: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd > > Hi Ralph - > > You make a good point on the sub-TLV. > I have talked to my WG chairs and we are going to change the text based on > your suggestion. > I will remove the MAC Withdraw sub-TLV registry for sequence number TLV > and instead use the Value from the LDP Type values (same as MAC List TLV). > > As for combining text of section 3 and 4.1. > > Section 3 described the packet fields, including the sequence number text. > The reason for sequence number text is - that it is applicable to both; > Sender (section 4.1) and Receiver (section 4.2). > > I will explore to remove the overlap.. > > Thanks, > Himanshu > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ralph Droms (rdroms) [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 3:13 PM > To: Shah, Himanshu > Cc: Andrew G. Malis; A. Jean Mahoney; General Area Review Team; > [email protected]; The IESG > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd > > Himanshu - I've been tied up in meetings most of the day today and am > about to go into more meetings that will last until the end of the day. > > I reviewed your revised draft briefly and it mostly looks OK. I have one > substantive comment, which is about an issue I didn't notice until now: > > How is the Mac Withdraw sub-TLV registry from which the "Sequence Number" > code point is taken differentiated from the LDP Parameters sub-TLV registry > from which the "MAC List" and "MAC Flush Parameter" code points are taken? > In other words, how does the receciver know to interpret the code point on > the Sequence Number TLV as a code point in the Mac Withdraw sub-TLV > registry while the code points on the MAC List TLV and the MAC Flush > Paramter TLV are interpreted as code points in the LDP Paramteres sub-TLV? > Shouldn't all the code points on the TLVs in this message come from a > single registry? > > I also have an editorial comment from my earlier review: the ifrst > paragraph of section 3 is mostly redundant with section 4.1 and that text > in section 3 should be merged into the text in section 4.1 > > - Ralph > > > On Oct 26, 2015, at 2:09 PM 10/26/15, Shah, Himanshu <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Thanks Andy. > > He did re-send the email without MIME and I was able to read and reply. > > > > Thanks, > > Himanshu > > > > From: Andrew G. Malis [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 2:08 PM > > To: Shah, Himanshu > > Cc: Ralph Droms (rdroms); A. Jean Mahoney; General Area Review Team; > > [email protected]; The IESG > > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd > > > > Himanshu, > > > > Ralph said: > > > > Himanshu - I've received your revised draft. I've been stuck in a > variety of meetings Monday and haven't had time to review it. I should be > able to look at it before the end of the day. > > > > - Ralph > > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Shah, Himanshu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can you send the email without MIME signature? > > > > Thanks, > > Himanshu > > > > From: Ralph Droms (rdroms) [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 1:02 PM > > To: Shah, Himanshu > > Cc: A. Jean Mahoney; General Area Review Team; > > [email protected]; The IESG > > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd > > >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
