> I am fine with this approach but this is not what the text of the > 'motivational' part of the Internet-Draft says. Currently there is an > a-synchronism between the text that explains what the I-D tries to do and the > action it recommends.
OK, well, you know I'm always in favour of more clarity. So how does this sound?: OLD This document changes that registration policy to "IETF Review", which also allows registrations from certain well reviewed Experimental RFCs. NEW This document changes that registration policy to "IETF Review", which also allows registrations from certain well reviewed Experimental RFCs, or, for example, corrections to registry errors from Informational RFCs, with IETF review and consensus. END Barry _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
