Thanks for your review, Brian. I propose: We note that [I-D.chen-ippm-coloring-based-ipfpm-framework] proposes a method similar to [I-D.tempia-opsawg-p3m], as ippm-list discussion revealed.
hope that does it, Al > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 8:43 PM > To: [email protected]; General Area Review > Team > Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-04 > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-04.txt > Reviewer: Brian Carpenter > Review Date: 2015-12-16 > IETF LC End Date: 2015-12-24 > IESG Telechat date: > > Summary: Almost ready > -------- > > Minor Issue: > ------------ > > We note that [I-D.chen-ippm-coloring-based-ipfpm-framework] proposes > a method similar to [I-D.tempia-opsawg-p3m], and ippm-list discussion > indicates [I-D.chen-ippm-coloring-based-ipfpm-framework] may be > covered by the same IPR as [I-D.tempia-opsawg-p3m]. > > I suggest removing the IPR comment. It may be an issue, but not for this > draft. We generally avoid taking a position on IPR applicablity (in > fact, > our lawyer tells us not to do so). _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
