Folks,

The authors of this draft have informed me this document is required by the wg 
charter. So, I withdraw any criticisms about this document's limited scope. The 
scope was dictated by the charter.

                                              Ron


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ronald Bonica
> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 4:01 PM
> To: IETF Gen-ART <[email protected]>; '[email protected]'
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Gen-ART review of
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-
> ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
> 
> Document:                                      draft-ietf-pals-congcons-01
> Reviewer:                                        Ron Bonica
> Review Date:                                  2015-12-15
> IETF LC End Date:                          2015-12-15
> IETF Telechat Date:                      TBD
> 
> Summary:          This document is ready for publication
> 
> In summary, draft-ietf-congcons-01:
> 
> - applies only to pseudowires that run over something other than MPLS (e.g.,
> GRE)
> - concludes that no additional mechanisms are needed for elastic
> pseudowires
> - concludes that an inelastic pseudowire MAY shutdown when it experiences
> higher-than-acceptable loss, latency or jitter
> - observes that that for TDM PWs, as loss rate increases, higher-than-
> acceptable loss generally occurs before the fixed-rate TDM PW could cause
> serious problems for competing congestion-responsive traffic
> - Therefore, no additional mechanisms are needed for inelastic pseudowires,
> either
> 
> I see nothing objectionable in the draft. However, its scope is extremely
> limited and it conclusions are not earthshattering. Nonetheless, the work is
> sound and deserves publication.
> 
> Major Issues: None
> 
> Minor Issues: None
> 
> Editorial Issues:
> 
> Ron Bonica
> 

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to