Thank you very much for the review! Authors, have you noted the comments & are taking action (if necessary)?
Jari On 11 Dec 2015, at 21:14, Meral Shirazipour <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD > before posting a new version of the draft. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq . > > Document: draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-media-rtp-session-12 > Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour > Review Date: 2015-12-11 > IETF LC End Date: 2015-12-09 (sorry for missed LC review-mistakenly reviewed > some other draft) > IESG Telechat date: 2015-12-17 > > > Summary: > This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have some > comments. > > Major issues: > > > Minor issues: > > > Nits/editorial comments: > -[Page 4], "Equal treatment of media" section. > While reading this paragraph the question comes to mind of if all media flows > get 'best effort' only or if all media flows could get e.g. 'Gold treatment', > or something in between... > It would be clearer to add a sentence to say how the treatment (QoS) is > specified and applied to all flows. > > -[Page 7], "This specifications purpose"----->"This specification's purpose" > > -[Page 8], "It is important to note that the RTP payload type is never used > to distinguish media streams." > It would be clearer to add this would be explained below. "As expalined > below, ..." > > -[Page 9], "form a independent"--->"form an independent" > > -[Page 11], "that FEC stream use"---->"that FEC stream uses" > > -[Page 11, > "(e.g., if an original RTP > session contains audio and video flows, for the associated FEC RTP > session where to use the "audio/ulpfec" and "video/ulpfec" payload > formats) > " > > This sentence may need revision, word "where" to be revised. > > -[Page 11], "with a associated generic"---->"with an associated generic" > > -[Page 11], ULP (uneven level protection) to spell out. > > -[Page 12], "this requires each media type use" -----> "this requires each > media type to use" > > -[Page 14], some references are expired. Should they remain cited? > [I-D.ietf-avtcore-multiplex-guidelines], [I-D.lennox-payload-ulp-ssrc-mux] > > > Best Regards, > Meral > --- > Meral Shirazipour > Ericsson > Research > www.ericsson.com > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
