I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover-14
Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov
Review Date: 2015-12-23
IETF LC End Date: 2015-12-23
IESG Telechat date: (if known) N/A
Summary: Ready with a couple of minor points that need to be clarified.
Major issues:
None
Minor issues:
In Section 5
However as [RFC4960] switchback behavior is
suboptimal in certain situations, especially in scenarios where a
number of equally good paths are available, an SCTP implementation
MAY support also, as alternative behavior, the Primary Path
Switchover mode of operation and MAY enable it based on users’
requests.
Did you really mean "users" (human beings) and not "applications"
(programs) here? I.e., is this something that needs to be exposed in
APIs or User Interfaces.
In Section 7.1: should new constants be defined with specific numeric
values, in order to improve interoperability?
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
