Thanks for the review, Suresh. I agree with your comment. Authors? Jari
On 06 Jan 2016, at 06:32, Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your > document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-isis-pcr-04.txt > Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan > Review Date: 2016-01-05 > Telechat Date: 2016-01-07 > > Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but I > have a minor comment that you might wish to address. > > * Minor > > There is no reference for the format of the Bandwidth fields in Sections 6.3 > and 6.4. I am assuming this refers to the Single Precision format (binary32) > from IEEE 754. If so, please add an explicit reference to this. > > Thanks > Suresh > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
