Jari, > On Feb 3, 2016, at 4:40 AM, Jari Arkko <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks again for your review, Francis! > > Based on the review, I have posted a no-objection vote for the document in > this week’s IESG telechat, but it would be good to get an acknowledgment from > the authors that they’ve seen the editorial observations from Francis.
Please see further down for the editorial changes I am suggesting. > > Jari > > On 01 Feb 2016, at 16:36, Francis Dupont <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just >> like any other last call comments. >> >> For more information, please see the FAQ at >> >> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Document: draft-mahesh-mef-urn-01.txt >> Reviewer: Francis Dupont >> Review Date: 2016-01-25 >> IETF LC End Date: 2016-02-04 >> IESG Telechat date: 2016-02-04 >> >> Summary: Ready >> >> Major issues: None >> >> Minor issues: None >> >> Nits/editorial comments: >> - I was first surpised there is no explanation about the MEF acronym >> but it is also the case on the Web site so IMHO it was Metro Etherner >> Forum at the beginning and it lost this meaning when it extended to >> Carrier Ethernet... So I have no concern about the lack of MEF expansion/ >> introduction/etc. That is correct. MEF has no expansion. They prefer to call themselves MEF Forum, without any expansion for MEF. >> >> - 2 page 3: the RFC 3406 is not very clear about the value to put >> in the registration date. It seems you put the date of the first >> instance of the document. Anyway the IANA and/or the RFC Editor >> shall fix the date if needed… Replaced the date with the following text: registration date: YYYY-MM-DD (Note to RFC Editor: Please add the registration date when this request gets accepted and remove this instruction) >> >> - Author's Address page 5: please add +1 in front of your phone number. >> (note this is the only action on your side) Done. >> >> Thanks >> >> [email protected] >> >> PS: the document has been push on the IESG agenda since I read it. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gen-art mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art > Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
