No problem, Luigi. I'll just be happy if my feedback proves helpful.
-Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Luigi Iannone [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 3:19 AM
To: Luigi Iannone
Cc: Peter Yee; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06
> On 08 Feb 2016, at 12:17, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> Back in April we indeed did not sent you a specific feedback.
> Reason is that we received several comments/reviews and batched everything in
> a new I-D, with sending specific feedback to all.
>
The correct sentence is: “without sending specific feedback to all”
I should really start to proofread my mails before hitting the send button ;-)
ciao
L.
> Yet, if you are unsatisfied on how we addressed the issues we certainly need
> to do more work.
>
> Give me some time to go again thoroughly through your first review and I’ll
> get back to you with a specific feedback.
>
> Thanks for your time spent on this document.
>
> ciao
>
> L.
>
>
>
>> On 06 Feb 2016, at 04:39, Peter Yee <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by
>> the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like
>> any other last call comment. For background on Gen-ART, please see
>> the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
>>
>> Document: draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06
>> Reviewer: Peter Yee
>> Review Date: February 5, 2016
>> IETF LC End Date: February 5, 2016
>> IESG Telechat date: February 18, 2016
>>
>> Summary: This draft has serious issues, described in the review, and
>> needs to be rethought. [Not ready]
>>
>> The draft attempts to specify the framework for the management of
>> experimental LISP EID sub-prefixes, but really could use some
>> additional work to flesh out the management aspects that are left unsaid.
>>
>> This draft fixes only two minor nits I raised in my review of the -04
>> version. Nothing else has been addressed, nor have I received any
>> feedback on that review. In light of this, I have little new to add.
>> It is possible that the agreement between the IANA and the RIPE NCC
>> will alleviate the major concern I had with the draft, but not being
>> privy to that agreement, I can't make that determination.
>>
>> My original review with the unaddressed comments can be found here:
>> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg11620.html
>>
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
