> WRT section 6.3.2 (now section 5.3.2) “persistently fails to deliver > acceptable TDM service” is discussed in significant detail in Appendix A of > the referenced [ID-ietf-pals-congcons] - it turns out to be a much longer > discussion by comparison to section 6.3.1 (now section 5.3.1) that involves > references to ITU-T G.826 and G.875. I’d prefer not to reproduce or try to > summarize that discussion in the tsvwg-circuit-breaker draft, but a sentence > could be added to the end of that section to point the reader in the right > direction, e.g.: “See Appendix A of [ID-ietf-pals-congcons] for further > discussion.”
Sounds reasonable to me as well. Thanks for the review & fix! Jari
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
