Hi, Please see my follow-up e-mail. It shall be standards track.
Sorry for the mess :) Regards, Christer On 29/04/16 12:53, "peter van der Stok" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Christer, > >thanks for the review. >Do you propose to change the standards track objective to informational? > >Peter > >Christer Holmberg schreef op 2016-04-29 11:48: >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq [1]> >> >> Document: draft-ietf-roll-applicability-ami-12 >> >> >> Reviewer: Christer Holmberg >> >> Review Date: 29 April 2016 >> >> IETF LC End Date: 12 April 2016 >> >> IETF Telechat Date: 5 May 2016 >> >> Summary: The document is well written, >> and ready for publication is informational RFC. >> >> Major Issues: None >> >> Minor Issues: None >> >> Editorial Issues: None >> >> Links: >> ------ >> [1] http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
