I am going through the Gen-ART reviews related to documents on tomorrow’s IESG telechat agenda.
For this document, thanks a lot for your review, Roni. Going to the comment and response from Lorenzo: > The intent here is to say that while the DHCPv6 PD RFC uses the words > "requesting router" to denote the DHCP client, is nothing in DHCPv6 PD itself > that requires the PD client to be a router (where, in IPv6, the term "router" > is defined in RFC2460). > > So - even though the DHCPv6 PD RFC uses the term "requesting router", a host > can use DHCPv6 PD to receive a prefix as well. The host can pick some > addresses for that prefix for its own use, originate/terminate packets on > those addresses, and not forward packets addressed to any of the other > addresses in the prefix. Lorenzo: Personally, I think it would perhaps useful to consider a slight reformulation of the text, given that for things like tethering or virtual machines, hosts essentially become routers. Jari
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
