I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange-06.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2016-05-14
IETF LC End Date: 2016-05-10
IESG Telechat date: 2016-05-19

Summary: Ready
--------

Comments:
---------

1) Thanks for fixing numerous points from my Last Call review.

2) I also raised the issue of whether BCP is the right status, in view
of sections 5 - 9 which refer to open questions and  possible future
protocol extensions. I would prefer to see these sections clearly
labelled as *not* part of the normative content. After feedback from
the authors, I don't see this as a show-stopper, but I think that
readers expecting a concrete description of a solution will be a
little surprised.

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to