Meral, Tim — thanks for the reviews and updates. I don’t have a comment on OGC URN, but I assume that you guys have a token on figuring out what the right answer is here…
Jari On 02 Jun 2016, at 10:22, Tim Schaub <[email protected]> wrote: > Bad response on my part about the OGC URN. > > Does anyone know if http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/1.3/CRS84 is > supposed to resolve to something other than an ogc:ExceptionReport > (I'm seeing Failed resolving http://www.opengis.netcrs/OGC/1.3/CRS84)? > > Should we go back to the urn:ogc:def:crs:OGC::CRS84 URN? Or maybe > remove this sentence altogether? > > Tim > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:07 AM, Tim Schaub <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thanks for the comments Meral. I've proposed >> https://github.com/geojson/draft-geojson/pull/208 to incorporate them. >> Responses below ... >> >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Meral Shirazipour >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> ... >> >>> -[Page 3], "any thing"--typo-->"anything" >> >> I *think* the original text was meant to emphasize "thing", but it >> ends up sounding awkward to me. I think we should go with "anything" >> if others agree. >> >>> -[Page 4], KML not spelled out at first use (Keyhole Markup Language?) >> >> Done. >> >>> -[Page 11],PIDF-LO, please spell out at first use and maybe reference >>> RFC5139. >> >> Done. But see below ... >> >>> -[Page 11], it says >>> >>> "Applications such as PIDF-LO that are sensitive to location >>> >>> uncertainty and confidence might treat ... >>> >>> " >>> >>> Not clear: if this is not an OK behavior, it should say "should not >>> treat..."? If this is an ok behavior, maybe it should say "MAY treat ..." >> >> I agree that this paragraph might add confusion. I think the section >> on Uncertainty and Confidence would be clearer if the whole paragraph >> were removed. >> >>> -[Page 12], "in the the case"---typo-->"in the case" >> >> Good catch. There were three of these. >> >>> -[Page 12], "the OGC's "http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/1.3/CRS84"; >>> [OGCURL]. " >>> >>> Should the URL be moved to reference section? >> >> Since http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/1.3/CRS84 is a URN, I don't >> think it makes sense to include in the reference section. It would be >> nice if it resolved to something useful so it could serve as a >> reference though. >> >>> -[Page 13], "or to to have"--typo-->"or to have" >> >> Changed. >> >>> -[Page 16], "the the semantics"--typo-->"the semantics" >> >> Also changed. >> >>> -[Page 18], "can not be"---->"cannot be" >> >> Done. >> >> Tim >> >>> >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> >>> Meral >>> >>> --- >>> >>> Meral Shirazipour >>> >>> Ericsson Research >>> >>> www.ericsson.com > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
