Thanks, all!

Jari

On 27 May 2016, at 01:07, Joel Halpern <[email protected]> wrote:

> This revision (-01) represents a reasonable effort to address my concerns.  
> My thanks to the author.
> 
> The document is ready for publication as a BCP
> 
> Yours,
> Joel M. Halpern
> 
> On 4/22/16 12:10 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
>> like any other last call comments.
>> 
>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>> 
>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>> 
>> Document: draft-sheffer-rfc6982bis-00
>>    Improving Awareness of Running Code: The Implementation
>>        Status Section
>> Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
>> Review Date: 22-April-2016
>> IETF LC End Date: 13-May-2016
>> IESG Telechat date: (if known)
>> 
>> Summary:
>> 
>> Major issues:
>> 
>> Minor issues:
>>    The introduction describes RFC1264 as requiring at least one
>> implementation.  The general requirement in RFC 1264 is multiple
>> implementations, at least two independent.  While it is a minor issue,
>> this document should characterize RFC 1264 more carefully.
>> 
>>    In the Alternative Formats section, it strikes me that there is an
>> alternative that is sometimes useful that is de-emphasised by the text
>> as written.  If there has been significant insight gained from the
>> implementations, that may be useful to capture in a longer-lived
>> context.  In that case, an RFC describing implementation may still be
>> useful.  I would appreciate it if the authors would consider adding a
>> short paragraph to this effect.
>> 
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gen-art mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to