I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team 
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF 
Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.



For more information, please see the FAQ at



< https://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq 
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__wiki.tools.ietf.org_area_gen_trac_wiki_GenArtfaq&d=CwICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=azY-8O9zKU_qyQsIatC9huyRk-QxiYF2J3tY-yt8SWE&s=Lejj6aBY4lSWw3Rk7wGB75sQItp6gprPZgz3nBBp4-c&e=%20>
 >.



Document: draft-ietf-calext-extensions-03

Reviewer: Dan Romascanu

Review Date: 6/21/16

IETF LC End Date: 6/22/16

IESG Telechat date: 7/7/16



Summary: A clear document, almost ready from the Gen-ART point of view. I 
recommend to clarify the two minor issues below before approval.



Major issues:



Minor issues:



1.       Should not this document be marked as 'Updates RFC 5545'? The document 
recommends that all properties not defined in 5545 always include a "VALUE" 
parameter if the type is other than "TEXT" It also modifies some existing 
properties and defines new properties and elements that bring into the standard 
extension elements added by vendors into their specification.

2.       I had a hard time understanding some of the details in 5.7 
(REFRESH-INTERVAL Property). These may be however due to my lack of familiarity 
with the style of iCal definitions and notations - so only explanations may be 
sufficient. First I do not understand what is covered under Property 
Parameters: what means 'IANA and non-standard property parameters' that can be 
defined here - and why here? Maybe an example would help. Second in the format 
definition: dur-value ... consisting of a positive duration of time - should 
not units be specified here as well? Last, I did not understand 
VALUE=DURATION:P1W - maybe it's just me missing the notation



Nits/editorial comments:



_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to